Regulatory classification
Determine provider and deployer roles, prohibited uses, and high-risk obligations before procurement.
Classification gap
Lenavix
Legal intelligence network
Evidence, obligations, jurisdictions, and risk move through one continuously auditable diligence graph.
Determine provider and deployer roles, prohibited uses, and high-risk obligations before procurement.
Classification gapTrace training rights, input retention, output ownership, and the warranties behind every model.
Rights exposureReview controls, incident response, sub-processors, model changes, and business continuity terms.
Control risk








Map each company, model, use case, and jurisdiction into one comparable legal-risk view.
Concentration riskSurface healthcare, employment, consumer, privacy, and financial-services duties before close.
Regulatory overlapTurn findings, mitigations, and residual exposure into a defensible investment-committee record.
Disclosure gap








Identify the systems, data flows, counterparties, and jurisdictions inside the diligence scope.
Scope uncertaintyCollect contracts, policies, technical evidence, and citations in a privilege-aware record.
Evidence gapConvert findings into conditions, mitigations, contractual protections, and an audit-ready opinion.
Opinion readinessBuyers ship faster than counsel can review. AI, privacy, cybersecurity, IP, and consumer protection laws apply, often all at once. Lenavix closes the gap.









Funds back AI faster than counsel can vet it. LP DD packets are due, and regulators are watching the portfolio, not just the vendor.









Illustrative examples only. Company and investor marks do not indicate customer status, partnership, endorsement, certification, review outcome, or an adverse finding.
From evidence to legal position
Vanta
Drata
Google Drive
SharePoint
Dropbox
iManage
EU AI Act
NYC LL 144
Colorado SB 26-189
NIST RMF
ISO 42001
NIST CSF
Each illustrative finding shows the source location that would support review. Counsel verifies applicability, evidence, and interpretation.
Sample HR AI
NYC LL 144 §20-871
Sample Search AI
DPA · Annex III (sub-processors)
Sample Model Provider
Trust center · ISO 42001 cert (missing)
Sample Language Model
Model card · §5 (Evaluation Data)
Sample Research Assistant
GDPR Art. 13(1)(a)
Illustrative examples only. These sample findings do not describe any real vendor, customer, review, or legal conclusion.
We organize selected laws, standards, and official guidance relevant to AI diligence across privacy, cybersecurity, employment, consumer protection, and sector-specific use cases. Applicability depends on the facts.
Legal force, scope notes, status dates, and official issuer links are documented in the Regulatory source register.
We're onboarding early access customers in waves. Join the waitlist and we'll reach out the moment your seat is ready.