Lenavix
For Corporate Counsel · PE Investors Legal Teams · Law Firms

AI regulatory
due diligence,
automated.

Join waitlist

Institutional network

Built, trusted and supported by

Built for every side of the deal

One platform. Three diligence flows.

Corporate Counsel

For companies buying AI.

Microsoft Anthropic OpenAI Google Mistral Cohere
01

Regulatory classification

Determine provider and deployer roles, prohibited uses, and high-risk obligations before procurement.

Classification gap
02

Data and model rights

Trace training rights, input retention, output ownership, and the warranties behind every model.

Rights exposure
03

Security and resilience

Review controls, incident response, sub-processors, model changes, and business continuity terms.

Control risk
PE · Legal Teams

For investors backing AI.

Hippocratic AI Glean Cursor Character.AI Harvey Runway
01

Portfolio exposure

Map each company, model, use case, and jurisdiction into one comparable legal-risk view.

Concentration risk
02

Sector obligations

Surface healthcare, employment, consumer, privacy, and financial-services duties before close.

Regulatory overlap
03

LP disclosure readiness

Turn findings, mitigations, and residual exposure into a defensible investment-committee record.

Disclosure gap
Law Firms

For the firms advising on AI.

EU AI Act GDPR Federal Trade Commission NIST ISO CCPA
01

Deal perimeter

Identify the systems, data flows, counterparties, and jurisdictions inside the diligence scope.

Scope uncertainty
02

Evidence integrity

Collect contracts, policies, technical evidence, and citations in a privilege-aware record.

Evidence gap
03

Defensible legal position

Convert findings into conditions, mitigations, contractual protections, and an audit-ready opinion.

Opinion readiness
For legal teams buying AI
Scale
AI procurement can outpace legal review capacity

Buyers ship faster than counsel can review. AI, privacy, cybersecurity, IP, and consumer protection laws apply, often all at once. Lenavix closes the gap.

Anthropic
illustrative vendor
OpenAI
illustrative vendor
Google
illustrative vendor
Mistral
illustrative vendor
Cohere
illustrative vendor
Hugging Face
illustrative vendor
Meta
illustrative vendor
Perplexity
illustrative vendor
Microsoft
illustrative vendor
For investors backing AI
Scope
Portfolio diligence spans systems, sectors, and jurisdictions

Funds back AI faster than counsel can vet it. LP DD packets are due, and regulators are watching the portfolio, not just the vendor.

Sequoia
illustrative investor
a16z
illustrative investor
Lightspeed
illustrative investor
Gen. Catalyst
illustrative investor
Greylock
illustrative investor
Founders Fund
illustrative investor
Insight
illustrative investor
Vista Equity
illustrative investor
Thoma Bravo
illustrative investor

Illustrative examples only. Company and investor marks do not indicate customer status, partnership, endorsement, certification, review outcome, or an adverse finding.

From evidence to legal position

From scattered evidence to an audit-ready legal position.

Vendor diligenceFor legal teams buying AI
Portfolio diligenceFor investors backing AI
How it works

Three steps, start to audit.

01 Connect

Pull from where your docs already live.

Connect approved trust-center, cloud-drive, and document-management sources. Access mode depends on each integration and customer configuration.
Vanta Drata Google Drive SharePoint Dropbox iManage
02 Map

Risks meet the rulebook, automatically.

Map identified risks to selected statutes, regulations, voluntary frameworks, and standards using source and version metadata. Counsel confirms applicability and interpretation.
EU AI Act NYC LL 144 Colorado SB 26-189 NIST RMF ISO 42001 GDPR CCPA NIST CSF FTC Act
03 Review

Findings with sources cited.

Review candidate findings alongside severity, source location, and evidence context before they enter the diligence file.
Severity Citations Audit trail Privileged
What you see

Risks surfaced. Sources cited.

Each illustrative finding shows the source location that would support review. Counsel verifies applicability, evidence, and interpretation.

Severity Finding Vendor Source
High No bias audit on file for AEDT Sample HR AI NYC LL 144 §20-871
High Sub-processor list missing DPA terms Sample Search AI DPA · Annex III (sub-processors)
Med No ISO 42001 statement Sample Model Provider Trust center · ISO 42001 cert (missing)
Med Model card lacks evaluation set Sample Language Model Model card · §5 (Evaluation Data)
Low Controller identity missing from privacy notice Sample Research Assistant GDPR Art. 13(1)(a)

Illustrative examples only. These sample findings do not describe any real vendor, customer, review, or legal conclusion.

Coverage

Cross-framework. Multi-jurisdiction.

We organize selected laws, standards, and official guidance relevant to AI diligence across privacy, cybersecurity, employment, consumer protection, and sector-specific use cases. Applicability depends on the facts.

Jurisdictions

Selected regimes. One register.

  • EUAI Act · phased application
  • US FederalFTC Act · NIST guidance
  • US StatesCA · NY · CO · TX · IL
  • UKUK GDPR · regulator guidance
  • APACSingapore · Korea · Japan
  • ChinaGenAI · algorithm rules
  • Rest of worldCanada · Brazil · Australia
Frameworks

Full-spectrum, normalized.

  • NIST AI RMF 1.0Voluntary risk framework
  • ISO/IEC 42001 : 2023International standard · 2023
  • EU AI ActHigh-risk obligations · Art. 9
  • MIT AI Risk Repo1,725 risks · 7 domains
  • GDPRSolely automated decisions · Art. 22
  • CCPA, as amended by CPRAConsumer privacy · California
  • NIST CSF 2.0Voluntary cybersecurity framework
  • FTC Act / Section 5Unfair or deceptive practices

Legal force, scope notes, status dates, and official issuer links are documented in the Regulatory source register.

Get started

Always audit ready.

We're onboarding early access customers in waves. Join the waitlist and we'll reach out the moment your seat is ready.